Why Zug
Several factors made Zug a plausible seat for the pipeline company. The shareholders came from four countries, which made a neutral seat attractive for their joint venture. While Switzerland offered political neutrality and a legal system that all shareholders trusted, Zug offered low taxes and a professional environment accustomed to international joint ventures. Gazprom already had business connections in Switzerland through its trading activities. The canton was known for the speed and pragmatism of its commercial register and its tax administration.
The tax advantages were significant for a pipeline company, which earns its income from the transport fees paid by the shippers of gas. Under the cantonal tax regime before 2020, a company whose business activity took place abroad could benefit from a reduced rate of profit tax. Nord Stream's pipeline lay entirely outside Switzerland, in the Baltic Sea, while the company's management and administration were in Zug. That combination fitted the model of the mixed or domiciliary company that Part B described, although the company's precise tax position has never been published.
For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of September 2025.