The political debate on immigration

Read the PDF edition (2 pages)

Immigration has been a central issue of Swiss politics for decades. The international economy of Zug has been part of the debate. In February 2014, Swiss voters accepted the popular initiative against mass immigration by a narrow majority. The initiative required Switzerland to control immigration through quotas, including for nationals of the European Union. In the canton of Zug, the initiative was narrowly rejected.¹ Parliament implemented it in a form that preserved the free movement of persons, with a preference for domestic workers in occupations with high unemployment. In September 2020, voters rejected a further initiative that would have ended the free movement of persons, which the canton of Zug rejected clearly.²

A further initiative, launched in 2023 and submitted in 2024, sought to limit the permanent resident population of Switzerland to ten million before 2050. Voters rejected it on 14 June 2026 with 54.8 per cent No votes nationally and 52.4 per cent in the canton of Zug.³ It would have required the Federal Council to take measures, including the termination of the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons, if the population approached that limit. The business community of Zug opposed the initiative, arguing that it would deprive the economy of the workers it needs. The debate reflects a tension that runs through Swiss politics: the economy depends on immigration, while a significant part of the population is concerned about its effects on housing, infrastructure, the environment and national identity.

Notes

Canton of Zug, "Wahlen & Abstimmungen", archive 2014, wab.zug.ch: popular initiative "Gegen Masseneinwanderung" of 9 February 2014 rejected in the canton with 50.06 per cent No (49.94 per cent Yes). National result of 50.3 per cent Yes: Wikipedia (German), "Eidgenössische Volksinitiative «Gegen Masseneinwanderung»", de.wikipedia.org. ↩
Canton of Zug, "Wahlen & Abstimmungen", archive 2020, wab.zug.ch: popular initiative "Für eine massvolle Zuwanderung (Begrenzungsinitiative)" of 27 September 2020 rejected in the canton with 60.36 per cent No. National result of 61.7 per cent No: Wikipedia (German), article on the Begrenzungsinitiative, de.wikipedia.org; vote also documented on admin.ch/de/begrenzungsinitiative. ↩
swissinfo.ch, "«Keine 10-Millionen-Schweiz!»: Die Schweiz lehnt die Initiative ab", 14 June 2026: popular initiative "Keine 10-Millionen-Schweiz! (Nachhaltigkeitsinitiative)" rejected with 54.8 per cent No; 13 cantons against, 10 in favour. Canton of Zug, "Wahlen & Abstimmungen", archive 2026, wab.zug.ch: 52.36 per cent No in the canton. Federal Council recommendation to reject: admin.ch/de/nachhaltigkeitsinitiative. The launch (2023) and submission (2024) dates are not stated in these sources. ↩

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of September 2025.

English

Contact

Dr Alexander Ressos, TEP

Rechtsanwalt/Attorney-at-Law

I am a Swiss attorney-at-law and also admitted as a solicitor in Hong Kong and in England & Wales, with almost 25 years of experience.

Together with my multilingual team, including Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Russian, Ukrainian and French native speakers, I advise companies and their owners from around the world on the full range of banking, corporate, commercial and tax law matters in Switzerland, including international tax planning, fiduciary services, and legal family office services including immigration & relocation or real estate investments. My practice has a particular focus on clients from growth and frontier markets in Greater China, Central Asia and the Caucasus, the rest of Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America, and I equally advise clients from Europe and North America. Through an affiliated Swiss trust company, we also take care of the incorporation and ongoing administration of their companies and other structures, including accounting, tax returns and corporate secretarial services, and I serve as a professional director where required. With the support of a network of first-class cooperation partners, I also implement solutions worldwide.

My approach is to act as a trusted advisor who works directly with decision-makers, on an equal footing: I start from what you want to achieve and shape every structure, contract and tax decision around your commercial goals and how it improves your after-tax return. As “lawyers who make it happen”, my team and I stay involved until your company is set up, your structure is in place and your transaction has closed, and we remain available for any follow-on work that may be required. You benefit from bespoke solutions and personal attention, and sound, friendly and practical advice. We are not the lowest-cost provider in the market, nor do we intend to be; our aim is to deliver well-founded, proper solutions and excellent value for money.

Get in touch →

The political debate on immigration

Notes

Setting up or expanding in Switzerland?