简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia Русский Українська English Deutsch Français Español Português Tiếng Việt Türkçe العربية עברית

The Switzerland–EU package and its limits

From the framework agreement to the package

The relationship between Switzerland and the European Union rests on sectoral agreements, the Bilateral Agreements I of 1999 and the Bilateral Agreements II of 2004. From 2008 the Union made the conclusion of further market access agreements conditional on an institutional framework that would ensure the uniform interpretation and dynamic development of the agreements. Switzerland and the Union negotiated an institutional framework agreement from 2014 onwards. The Federal Council broke off these negotiations on 26 May 2021, concluding that substantial differences between Switzerland and the Union persisted on key aspects of the agreement. In the domestic debate these differences concerned above all wage protection, the Citizens' Rights Directive and state aid.1 The consequences for the financial sector were already visible. The European Commission had allowed the equivalence of Swiss stock exchange regulation to expire on 30 June 2019, and it adopted no equivalence decision for Swiss investment firms under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR), as Chapter E.IV has described.

After exploratory talks, formal negotiations on a new package began in March 2024. They were materially concluded on 20 December 2024. The chief negotiators initialled the texts on 21 May 2025, and the Federal Council approved the package on 13 June 2025 and opened the consultation procedure. A joint declaration followed on 25 June 2025. The agreement on Swiss participation in Union programmes was signed on 10 November 2025 and had been applied provisionally from the beginning of 2025.2 The remaining agreements and protocols were signed in Brussels on 2 March 2026 by the President of the Confederation, Guy Parmelin, and the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. A joint declaration established a high-level dialogue between the parties.3 On 13 March 2026 the Federal Council adopted its dispatch to Parliament on the "Stabilization and Development of Switzerland–EU Relations (Bilaterals III)", a document of 1,086 pages.4

Content of the package

The package follows the sectoral approach. It does not create a single horizontal framework agreement but inserts institutional elements into each of the agreements that give access to the single market. These elements comprise the dynamic adoption of relevant Union law, the uniform interpretation of the agreements, a mechanism for the settlement of disputes by an arbitral tribunal that must refer questions of Union law to the Court of Justice of the European Union, and rules on state aid in the agreements where they apply.5 Five existing agreements are updated: those on the free movement of persons, air transport, land transport, mutual recognition of conformity assessments and trade in agricultural products. Three new agreements cover electricity, food safety and health. Switzerland participates in Union programmes such as Horizon Europe, Erasmus+ and Digital Europe and commits to a contribution of about CHF 350 million a year from 2030 to the reduction of economic and social disparities in the Union. The domestic implementation requires three new federal acts and amendments to 36 existing acts, fifteen of them substantial.6

The free movement of persons is the part of the package that matters most for Ticino. The updated agreement extends the adoption of parts of the Citizens' Rights Directive, subject to exceptions negotiated by Switzerland, and a safeguard clause that Switzerland may invoke in case of serious economic or social difficulties. Domestic measures on wage protection accompany it.7 Because Ticino's labour market depends on more than 75,000 cross-border commuters, described in Chapter H.I, any change to free movement and to the instruments against wage dumping affects the canton's banks, trading houses and logistics firms directly. In the popular votes on immigration of 2014 and 2020 Ticino voted more restrictively than the Swiss average and accepted both initiatives, including the limitation initiative of 2020, which the country as a whole rejected with 61.7 per cent of the votes.8 The canton's political position on the package is therefore more cautious than that of its financial sector.

Notes

  1. Federal Council, "Das Institutionelle Abkommen Schweiz-EU wird nicht abgeschlossen", press release, 26 May 2021, https://www.admin.ch/gov/de/start/dokumentation/medienmitteilungen.msg-id-83705.html. The press release refers to substantial differences on key aspects without listing them in its summary. The three areas named in the text are those of the domestic debate. ↩
  2. Swiss Federal Council, "Switzerland–EU package of agreements to be signed on 2 March", press release, 25 February 2026, https://www.admin.ch/de/newnsb/afSUBKNIaRs3s1tqaCebd; Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, "Weiterentwicklung der Beziehungen Schweiz–EU", https://www.eda.admin.ch/de/weiterentwicklung-beziehungen-schweiz-eu (consulted October 2026), for the material conclusion on 20 December 2024. ↩
  3. "Abkommen des Pakets Schweiz–EU: Unterzeichnung in Brüssel", law.ch, March 2026, https://law.ch/lawnews/2026/03/abkommen-des-pakets-schweiz-eu-unterzeichnung-in-bruessel/. ↩
  4. "Nach 13 Jahren Verhandlungen kommt das EU-Paket ins Parlament", SRF News, 13 March 2026, https://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/beziehungen-schweiz-eu-nach-13-jahren-verhandlungen-kommt-das-eu-paket-ins-parlament; FDFA (above). ↩
  5. FDFA (above), on the dynamic adoption of law. The remaining institutional elements are described from the Federal Council's explanatory material on the package. ↩
  6. FDFA (above), which lists the five updated agreements (free movement of persons, land transport, air transport, agriculture, technical barriers to trade), the three new federal acts (on the monitoring of state aid, the recognition of professional qualifications and Switzerland's cohesion contribution) and the 36 amended acts, "15 von substanziellem und 21 von geringfügigem Ausmass". ↩
  7. FDFA (above), on the domestic implementation of the safeguard clause with the participation of the cantons and the social partners, the package of 14 domestic measures on wage protection and the concerns about the Citizens' Rights Directive raised in the consultation. ↩
  8. Swissvotes, "Volksinitiative «Gegen Masseneinwanderung»", vote of 9 February 2014 (50.33 per cent yes nationally, accepted in Ticino), https://www.swissvotes.ch/vote/580.00, and "Volksinitiative «Für eine massvolle Zuwanderung (Begrenzungsinitiative)»", vote of 27 September 2020 (38.29 per cent yes nationally, accepted in Ticino), https://swissvotes.ch/vote/631.00. The figure of more than 75,000 cross-border commuters is taken from Chapter H.I with sources. ↩

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Switzerland?

Helvetica Register is an information portal. It explains what companies and entrepreneurs from around the world, and in particular from Greater China, Central Asia and the Caucasus, the rest of Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America, need to know about doing business in Switzerland: company law, commercial contracts, licences, banking, tax and residence.

Legal advice in Switzerland is provided by Ressos Legal, a Zurich law practice advising on all areas of Swiss law under the direction of Dr Alexander Ressos. Further information is available at www.ressos.ch.

Your project in Switzerland Speak to Dr Alexander Ressos Company formation, shareholder and commercial agreements, acquisitions, licences, bank accounts, tax and residence permits: I advise on Swiss law and coordinate with your lawyers in your home country, as well as local counsel in other jurisdictions as required.