The Swiss variety of Italian

Read the PDF edition (2 pages)

The Italian used in Swiss institutions is standard Italian, as Article 5 paragraph 2 of the Languages Act requires. It is nevertheless a recognizable variety. Linguists call the words and uses specific to Swiss Italian elvetismi, Helvetisms. Some of them have recently been included in the dictionaries of the Italian language.¹ They fall into several groups. The first group consists of institutional terms that reflect the different political order of Switzerland. Consiglio di Stato means the cantonal government in Ticino, while in Italy it designates the supreme administrative court. Gran Consiglio is the cantonal parliament, Municipio the executive of a commune. A member of the cantonal parliament, whom the constitution calls a deputato, is commonly referred to as a granconsigliere.²

A second group consists of loanwords and calques from German and French. Autocollante for a sticker follows the French autocollant, Natel for a mobile phone comes from a German acronym, and NPA, for the postal code, renders the French numéro postal d'acheminement. Autopostale designates the PostBus service, and franchetto is a colloquial calque for the Swiss franc. Signs such as Grazie per non fumare follow the French merci de ne pas fumer.³ In commerce, an azione is a special offer in a shop, from the German Aktion, whereas in standard Italian azione also means a share in a company. A classatore is a ring binder, from the German Klassierer and the French classeur, where Italy uses raccoglitore. In the language of federal administration, the Federal Council licenzia a dispatch when it adopts it and sends it to Parliament, a usage shaped by the German verabschieden. It extends a sense that standard Italian knows from licenziare alle stampe, to approve a text for printing, while in everyday Italian licenziare above all means to dismiss an employee.⁴

The elvetismi matter for legal work because some of them are terms of art. A Swiss Italian contract speaks of the società anonima, the ditta as the business name, the precetto esecutivo as the payment order in debt enforcement and the rigetto dell'opposizione as the setting aside of the debtor's objection under the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Act, the legge federale sulla esecuzione e sul fallimento (LEF). An Italian lawyer who reads these terms with the meanings they have in Italian law will misunderstand them. Conversely, a Swiss Italian document that uses Italian legal terms where Swiss terms exist can create ambiguity in Swiss proceedings. The terminology of Swiss Italian law is a separate legal language, and its relationship to the terminology of the Italian Republic is the subject of Chapter J.III.

Common misconception. Italian clients and advisers often assume that Swiss legal texts in Italian use the terminology of Italian law. They do not. Swiss Italian legal language follows the concepts of Swiss law, which it renders through terms such as società anonima, precetto esecutivo or Consiglio di Stato that either do not exist in Italian law or mean something else there. A Swiss text in Italian must therefore be read as Swiss law in the Italian language.

Notes

1. Wikipedia, "Italiano svizzero", https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italiano_svizzero (used as a last resort), which cites Mario Savoia and Antonio Vitale, Lo Svizzionario (2002), and the work of Elena M. Pandolfi and Matteo Casoni on language contact in Swiss Italian. ↩
2. Wikipedia, "Italiano svizzero" (above), on Consiglio di Stato; Constitution of the Republic and Canton of Ticino (above), Art. 17 (Municipio), Art. 57 (Gran Consiglio) and Art. 65 (Consiglio di Stato). ↩
3. Wikipedia, "Italiano svizzero" (above); Wikipedia, "Lingua italiana in Svizzera" (above). ↩
4. Wikipedia, "Italiano svizzero" (above), on azione; Vocabolario Treccani, "classatore", https://www.treccani.it/vocabolario/classatore/ (only the sense of a grain-sorting device), and "licenziare", https://www.treccani.it/vocabolario/licenziare/ (including licenziare alle stampe). ↩

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of August 2025.