简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia Русский Українська English Deutsch Français Español Português Tiếng Việt Türkçe العربية עברית

The Hin Leong trial and the question of responsibility

Read the PDF edition (2 pages)

The trial of the founder of Hin Leong, which ended in 2024 with his conviction for cheating and abetting forgery, brought to light the responsibility of management in a fraud that auditors, banks and authorities had failed to detect for years.1 The creditor banks brought civil actions against the founder, his family and the auditors. The liquidators, for their part, pursued the recovery of assets scattered across several jurisdictions, with low recovery rates.2 For the Geneva banks that were exposed, the lesson was twofold: on the one hand, due diligence on the principal counts as much as due diligence on the company, and on the other hand, the presence of a reputable auditor guarantees nothing when the accounts are falsified at source.

The trial also showed the limits of criminal enforcement: a criminal conviction handed down four years after the events, in a foreign country, returns nothing to the creditors and provides only a weak deterrent. Prevention, through the countermeasures described above, remains the only effective protection. Its cost, which the banks have passed on to the traders through stricter conditions and higher margins, is the price of fraud for honest traders.

Notes

  1. “Singapore oil trader OK Lim convicted of cheating, abetting forgery”, AFP via Malay Mail, 10 May 2024, cited in the bibliography. ↩
  2. Wikipedia (en), art. “Hin Leong”: application for court protection on 17 April 2020, investigation announced on 21 April 2020; settlement of September 2024 under which the Lim family undertook to pay around 3.59 billion dollars to the liquidators and to HSBC; sentencing of Lim Oon Kuin on 18 November 2024 to 17 years and six months in prison, reduced to 13 years and six months on appeal on 4 March 2026, imprisonment from 28 March 2026. ↩

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of September 2025.

Setting up or expanding in Switzerland?

Helvetica Register is an information portal. It explains what companies and entrepreneurs from around the world, and in particular from Greater China, Central Asia and the Caucasus, the rest of Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America, need to know about doing business in Switzerland: company law, commercial contracts, licences, banking, tax and residence.

Legal advice in Switzerland is provided by Ressos Legal, a Zurich law practice advising on all areas of Swiss law under the direction of Dr Alexander Ressos. Further information is available at www.ressos.ch.

Your project in Switzerland Speak to Dr Alexander Ressos Company formation, shareholder and commercial agreements, acquisitions, licences, bank accounts, tax and residence permits: I advise on Swiss law and coordinate with your lawyers in your home country, as well as local counsel in other jurisdictions as required.