Pharma, Geopolitics and Trade Policy — conclusion
Conclusion
The pharmaceutical industry of Basel enters the decade to 2035 in a position of strength and exposure at the same time. Its strength lies in its scientific base, its global market position, its financial resources and the support of a canton and a country that regard it as a pillar of their prosperity. Its exposure arises from its dependence on the American market, which since 2025 has used tariffs, pricing policy and security legislation to reshape the location decisions of foreign pharmaceutical groups, and from a geopolitical environment in which China has become both a source of innovation and a target of Western restrictions. Syngenta, a Basel company owned by the Chinese state, embodies this tension in a single corporate structure. The four scenarios developed in this chapter, "Atlantic anchor", "Hollowing out", "Bloc builder" and "Biotech renaissance", are analytical constructs designed to test strategies against different combinations of these forces, and the signposts identified allow observers to recognise which of them is gaining ground.
For the financial centre of Basel, the lesson is that its fortunes are tied to those of its largest industry more closely than its banks' balance sheets suggest. Treasury business, pension fund returns, the wealth of private clients, cantonal revenue and the demand for legal and tax advice all depend on decisions taken in Washington, Brussels and Beijing about medicines and trade. How Swiss banks themselves can adapt their business model to a world of fragmentation, competition and regulatory change is the subject of the next chapter.
For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of August 2025.